La verdad es que he dudado en poner esto, por el lío que se montó con la otra discusión sobre Idomeneo. Pero bueno, lo que dice Barenboim sobre el tema es muy interesante:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/10/02/ ... dbaren.php
Citar:
It is the duty of a government to protect its citizens from the threat of violence and terrorism. But is it the duty of a theater to protect its audience from artistic expressions that might be interpreted as offensive?
Citar:
The very essence of the role of theater in society is its ability to remain in constant dialogue with reality regardless of its impact on real events. This form of dialogue is neither a sign of courage nor of cowardice, but must come of the inner necessity of an individual or an institution to express itself.
Limiting one's freedom of expression as a response to fear is as ineffective as imposing one's point of view through military force
Citar:
Art is neither moral nor immoral, neither edifying nor offensive; it is our reaction to it that makes it one or the other in our minds. Our society sees controversy more and more as a negative attribute, yet difference of opinion and the difference between content and the perception of it lie at the very essence of creativity
Citar:
Both political correctness and fundamentalism give answers not in order to further understanding, but in order to avoid questions. Acting out of fear does not appease the fundamentalists, who in any case have no intention of being appeased, and does not encourage the enlightened Muslims whose aim is progress and dialogue